Honduran Public Ministry under fire for selective justice

Johel Antonio Zelaya

Congresswoman Fátima Mena, representative of the Salvadoran Party of Honduras (PSH), has expressed concerns about the performance of Attorney General Johel Antonio Zelaya. According to the congresswoman, the head of the Public Prosecutor’s Office is acting in line with the interests of the Liberty and Refoundation Party (LIBRE), currently in power. These statements come in the context of the recent primary elections, where Mena has pointed to the existence of selective justice promoted by the Public Prosecutor’s Office.

In her remarks, the congresswoman also raised concerns about the institution’s impartiality, emphasizing the disparity in how the opinions of the National Electoral Council (CNE) members are treated.

Organizational environment and inquiries regarding neutrality

The stance of Congresswoman Fátima Mena is set within a political environment that values the independence of institutions as crucial for fostering transparent and fair democratic processes. The lawmaker has pointed out that the activities of the Public Prosecutor’s Office, led by Johel Antonio Zelaya, show a bias towards selective justice, particularly in the backdrop of the recent preliminary elections. The congresswoman argues that the attorney general is acting in favor of partisan agendas, which, she believes, undermines the perception of neutrality and fairness in the administration of justice.

In this context, the congresswoman has questioned the difference in the treatment of statements made by members of the National Electoral Council. It has been noted that Marlon Ochoa’s statement has received greater attention, while the concerns of other council members have been relegated. According to Mena, this situation contributes to the perception of biased handling of information and institutional decisions.

Impact on the political and voting landscape

The remarks made by Congresswoman Mena have influenced the political atmosphere in Honduras, particularly concerning trust in the organizations tasked with maintaining transparency and justice in elections. Mena’s backing of CNE President Cossette López underscores the worries of certain electoral body members regarding the risk of facing legal action for their roles on various council committees.

In this situation, emerging amid a strained political environment, the independence and openness of institutions are vital for ensuring the credibility of democratic operations. The remarks made by the congresswoman, along with the responses they have stirred, underscore the necessity of preserving institutional equilibrium to bolster public trust in the nation’s electoral and judicial frameworks.